<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>fair use</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>We Need a Political Litmus Test for Tech and SOPA Isn&#039;t It</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2012/1/5/we-need-political-litmus-test-tech-and-sopa-isnt-it</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2012/01/04/we-need-a-political-litmus-test-for-tech-and-sopa-isnt-it/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;GigaOM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Stacey Higginbotham&lt;br&gt;A growing problem as the web and technology becomes more central to how we share, communicate and work is that an average person doesn’t know how abstract laws can affect their lives and the media doesn’t expose how well (or poorly) politicians understand technology. As a result, certain companies with lobbyists are getting away moulding our laws and policies in their favor and in the process they are going to hinder how Internet works and thrives.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3211">broadband competition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2984">freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/753">Internet Freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3274">media policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/sopa">SOPA</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:13:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">94043 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How &#039;What What (In the Butt)&#039; Unintentionally Bolstered Fair Use</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/8/22/how-what-what-butt-unintentionally-bolstered-fair-use</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/how-what-what-in-the-butt-made-fair-use-easier-to-claim.ars&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;Federal Judge J.P. Stadtmueller has waded into the swampland of fair use, &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;South Park&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;What What (In the Butt)&amp;quot; to deliver a July 6 order that may break new judicial territory by citing the &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;South Park&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; episode &amp;quot;Osama bin Laden Has Farty Pants&amp;quot; in its footnotes. And Stadtmueller has the proper feel for the absurd needed in any judge about to rule on a case involving the phrase, &amp;quot;You want to do it in my butt, in my butt?&amp;quot; The case has interesting implications for fair use law.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:35:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">91113 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press Blasts Newport TV&#039;s Attempt to Intimidate</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/7/13/free-press-blasts-newport-tvs-attempt-intimidate</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tvnewscheck.com/article/2011/07/12/52486/free-press-blast-newport-over-consolidation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TVNewsCheck&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Harry A. Jessell&lt;br&gt;Free Press says that Newport Television&amp;#039;s demand that it stop using station logos as part of its campaign against virtual duopolies is not a violation of copyright law, but &amp;quot;a clear and outrageous attempt to intimidate Free Press, and to silence commentary on this important issue.&amp;quot;

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/campaign/save-news">Save the News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/67">Media Consolidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/covert-consolidation">covert consolidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/94">Free Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/513">local news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/newport-television">Newport Television</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:44:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90212 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Winner of &#039;Copyright School&#039; Video Challenge Announced</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/7/12/winner-copyright-school-video-challenge-announced</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/announcing-winner-public-knowledge-copyright-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Public Knowledge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Mehan Jayasuriya&lt;br&gt;Public Knowledge announced the winner of a contest to produce a more balanced educational video on Fair Use that YouTube&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Copyright School.&amp;quot; The winning video explains the basics of fair use and encourages creators to exercise their rights by reusing, remixing and recontextualizing existing content in their videos.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/596">intellectual property</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:46:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90188 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press to Newport: We Won&#039;t Be Silenced</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/7/12/free-press-newport-we-wont-be-silenced</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savethenews.org/blog/11/07/11/free-press-newport-we-wont-be-silenced&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SavetheNews.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Josh Stearns&lt;br&gt;Free Press launched Change the Channels, a new campaign to uncover and fight covert consolidation, a practice whereby TV stations outsource their local news operations to their competitors resulting in less local competition and diversity, and sometimes even duplicate newscasts. We seem to have struck a nerve. Newport Television, one of the worst covert consolidation offenders, sent Free Press a &amp;quot;cease and desist&amp;quot; letter last week. But Free Press is not backing down and won&amp;#039;t be bullied into silence.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/campaign/save-news">Save the News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/67">Media Consolidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/change-channels">Change the Channels</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/changethechannelsorg">ChangetheChannels.org</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/covert-consolidation">covert consolidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/85">Free Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5535">Josh Stearns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/newport-television">Newport Television</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:39:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90184 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Everything Is a Remix: The Invention Edition</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/6/24/everything-remix-invention-edition</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110622/13344514806/everything-is-remix-invention-edition.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tech Dirt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Innovation is almost always about remixing. It&amp;#039;s about taking ideas that are already out there, and transforming them and adding to them. And yet, our social and legal policies seem to deny this. Copying is one part of the very important process of innovation. Copying is a component, but the important part is then taking that copy and doing more with it.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4241">innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/596">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2507">patents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/remixing-culture">remixing culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/84">Civil Rights &amp;amp; Media Justice</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:22:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89920 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fair Use Isn&#039;t Much Good if You Can&#039;t Afford It</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/6/24/fair-use-isnt-much-good-if-you-cant-afford-it</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2011/06/24/fair-use-isnt-much-good-if-you-cant-afford-it/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;GigaOM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Mathew Ingram&lt;br&gt;Remixing bits of text, images and video to create new forms of art is arguably a huge social benefit. And the principle of &amp;quot;fair use&amp;quot; is supposed to make that easier to enable. But &amp;quot;fair use&amp;quot; only applies if you can afford to fight for your idea in court. What does that mean for the future of the remixable web?

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6697">Free Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/596">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4326">Remix</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:09:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89918 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Copyright Troll Righthaven Achieves Spectacular &#039;Fair Use&#039; Loss</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/3/23/copyright-troll-righthaven-achieves-spectacular-fair-use-loss</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/copyright-troll-righthaven-achieves-spectacular-fair-use-loss.ars?&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;In its bid to sue hundreds of bloggers, commentors and website operators from posting even a few sentences from newspaper stories, the copyright zealots at Righthaven have just scored an own goal. A federal judge ruled in one of the company&amp;#039;s many lawsuits, saying that even the complete republication of copyrighted newspaper content can be &amp;quot;fair use.&amp;quot;

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/righthaven">Righthaven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:03:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87816 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Fair Use&#039; Generates Trillions in the US Alone</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/4/28/fair-use-generates-trillions-us-alone</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/fair-use-generates-trillions-in-the-us-alone.ars?&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;Strengthening the nation&amp;#039;s intellectual property laws isn&amp;#039;t just a matter of cracking down ever harder, of limiting the limitations and giving increasing power to rightsholders. Fair use and other limitations on copyright themselves generate significant economic activity -- $4.7 trillion in 2007.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:10:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79195 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Media Minutes: February 19, 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/76974</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Law professor Susan Crawford discusses Google&#039;s plan to build high-speed fiber networks in a small number of trial locations across the United States. And Public Knowledge has introduced a new Copyright Reform Act -- model legislation that will look at updating copyright law for the digital age.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/node/76974&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/913">broadband access</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/190">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6931">copyright reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/941">fair use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/596">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6930">InternetForEveryone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/266">Public Knowledge</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.freepress.net/files/MM_2-19-10_Transcript.pdf" length="42938" type="application/pdf" />
 <enclosure url="http://www.freepress.net/image/view/71708/preview" length="4416" type="image/gif" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:06:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Candace Clement</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76974 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

