<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Net Neutralilty</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T Forgets They Began the Network Neutrality Debate</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/9/3/att-forgets-they-began-network-neutrality-debate</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Forgets-They-Began-The-Network-Neutrality-Debate-110195&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Karl Bode&lt;br&gt;It should be remembered that it was AT&amp;amp;T&amp;#039;s vocalized desire to act as a bridge troll that began the Net Neutrality debate, and the original goal of Net Neutrality rules was to prevent AT&amp;amp;T from abusing its duopoly/monopoly power to extort passers by. So, suggesting that AT&amp;amp;T could abuse their market position using paid prioritization certainly isn&amp;#039;t conspiracy material. It&amp;#039;s not even controversial.



</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/205">at&amp;amp;t</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/385">broadband network management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/89">fcc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/94">Free Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/paid-prioritization">paid prioritization</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:46:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82616 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon: Please, Only We Can Lie About Network Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/8/26/verizon-please-only-we-can-lie-about-network-neutrality</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Please-Only-We-Can-Lie-About-Network-Neutrality-110083&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Karl Bode&lt;br&gt;Google and Verizon&amp;#039;s defense of their proposal has been one distortion after another, the companies insisting the weak-kneed framework is solely about empowering the consumer. Here&amp;#039;s a real fact: Verizon wants what any massive, government-pampered duopolist wants: more strings-free taxpayer money, a lazy regulatory body with no consumer protection authority whatsoever, government protection from competition, and the ability to engage in any business practices they like, no matter how unethical or anti-competitive.


</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/google-verizon-net-neutrality-deal">Google-Verizon Net Neutrality deal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/178">Open Internet</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:22:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82398 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Internet Is Not Just a Privilege, It Is a Necessity</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/5/12/internet-not-just-privilege-it-necessity</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamobilizing.org/internet-not-just-privilege-it-necessity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Media Mobilizing Project&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Bryan Mercer&lt;br&gt;Conservative pundits would like to tell us that FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski&amp;#039;s proposal to reclassify broadband transport services to Title II is a government take over of the Internet. They are wrong.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3150">astroturf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/205">at&amp;amp;t</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/conservative-pundits">conservative pundits</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/89">fcc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/reclassification">reclassification</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 11:52:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79652 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press Argues in Historic Comcast v FCC Case</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/75872</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Free Press will argue in support of the Federal Communications Commission today in the &lt;em&gt;Comcast v. FCC&lt;/em&gt; case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Free Press counsel &lt;strong&gt;Marvin Ammori&lt;/strong&gt; is arguing for Free Press as an &quot;intervenor&quot; in the case on behalf of public interest groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/node/75872&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/96">Ben Scott</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/384">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/237">Marvin Ammori</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.freepress.net/image/view/45967/preview" length="4571" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:32:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Moira Vahey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75872 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press Calls AT&amp;T’s Net Neutrality Scheme a Bait and Switch </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/75390</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Washington, DC -- Today, AT&amp;amp;T sent a letter to the FCC outlining their new approach to Net Neutrality rules. Free Press Policy Director &lt;strong&gt;Ben Scott&lt;/strong&gt; made the following statement:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/node/75390&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/205">at&amp;amp;t</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/96">Ben Scott</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.freepress.net/image/view/37622/preview" length="4398" type="image/gif" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:47:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Moira Vahey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75390 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press Urges San Francisco to Support Net Neutrality </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74809</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SAN FRANCISCO -- A motion urging the Federal Communications Commission to create strong Network Neutrality rules will be voted on today by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/node/74809&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4117">Misty Perez-Truedson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/664">San Francisco</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.freepress.net/image/view/57538/preview" length="15706" type="image/png" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:15:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Moira Vahey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74809 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Net Neutrality Is a Good Investment</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/73831</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/09/10/22/net-neutrality-good-investment&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SavetheInternet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Craig Aaron&lt;br&gt;One of the most pervasive myths being peddled by Net Neutrality opponents is the idea that protecting the free and open Internet will somehow hinder investment in the telecommunications sector. But that&amp;#039;s just not true, and a new report has the data to prove it.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3150">astroturf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6490">Finding the Bottom Line</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/467">lobbyists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2567">open networks</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:25:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73831 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wireless Lobbyists Step Up Defensive Against Net Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/73116</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/09/the_wireless_industry_has_been.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cecilia Kang&lt;br&gt;The wireless industry has been on a charm offensive, working overtime to lobby regulators, journalists and lawmakers to ease off proposals for new regulations. Consumer advocacy groups say the wireless lobby is jumping the gun.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/205">at&amp;amp;t</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2114">CTIA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/89">fcc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/179">Wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:16:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73116 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Internet Is a Feminist Issue</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/62003</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/09/07/06/internet-feminist-issue&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SavetheInternet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Mary Alice Crim&lt;br&gt;The Internet is the only open platform where women can express their own views and post their own material without a gatekeeper. This ability to self-publish turns the mainstream media model, with its scarcity of women media owners and media makers, on its head.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4766">feminism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5861">Internet &amp;amp; culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2567">open networks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5862">women&amp;#039;s media</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:33:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62003 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress Should Preserve Net Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/46690</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/17/ED4414PASG.DTL&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The deeper the Internet becomes ingrained in our daily lives, the more the murkiness about Net Neutrality policy is going to cost us. 2009 is the year for Congress to take care of this vital piece of unfinished business and make Net Neutrality the law.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/91">congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/708">Net Neutralilty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3931">Obama administration</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:50:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46690 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

