<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>search neutrality</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Walden: FCC Net Rules Could Lead to Google Regulations</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/3/9/walden-fcc-net-rules-could-lead-google-regulations</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/465003-Walden_FCC_Net_Rules_Could_Lead_To_Google_Regs.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Broadcasting and Cable&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
John Eggerton&lt;br&gt;House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) said that the FCC should not regulate Google&amp;#039;s business any more than it should ISPs. That came in opening remarks in the Communications Subcommittee legislative hearing on a resolution to invalidate the FCC&amp;#039;s new Network Neutrality regulations.


</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/215">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:03:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87389 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google Favors Itself 19 Percent of the Time</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/1/20/google-favors-itself-19-percent-time</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/survey-google-favors-itself-only-19-of-the-time-61675&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Search Engine Land&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Danny Sullivan&lt;br&gt;For the past year or so, there&amp;#039;s been a rising meme that Google is altering its search results in ways to favor itself over competitors. Now a new study is out showing the opposite. Google is far more likely not to show its own products in the first spot of its search results.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:02:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85885 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Regulating Google&#039;s Results?</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/1/20/regulating-googles-results</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/01/regulating-googles-results-law-prof-calls-search-neutrality-incoherent.ars&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Neutrality&amp;quot; -- if it&amp;#039;s good enough for the core of the Internet, isn&amp;#039;t it good enough for the edge? The biggest Internet providers say it is, and they would love to have the government slap a few Net Neutrality rules on Google, just to see how the advertising giant likes the taste of the regulatory bridle.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/issue/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85869 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google and the New York Times Battle Over Search Neutrality </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/7/19/google-and-new-york-times-battle-over-search-neutrality</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/1670930/google-and-the-new-york-times-battle-over-search-neutrality&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Fast Company&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Austin Carr&lt;br&gt;In competing op-eds published days apart, Google&amp;#039;s VP of search product and user experience went head to head with the &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;New York Times&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; editorial board over search neutrality.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/issue/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/390">New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:17:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81303 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Worried about Search Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/6/16/microsoft-worried-about-search-neutrality</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/103371-report-microsoft-worried-about-search-neutrality&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Hill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Sara Jerome&lt;br&gt;Microsoft may be the latest company to raise concerns about Google acting as an Internet gatekeeper. Search neutrality is the notion that search engines should not favor certain content, including their own.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:52:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80574 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Careful What You Wish for Google: Here Comes &#039;Search Neutrality&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/5/3/careful-what-you-wish-google-here-comes-search-neutrality</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2010/04/30/careful-what-you-wish-for-google-here-comes-search-neutrality/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Connected Planet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Joan Engebretson&lt;br&gt;In the &amp;quot;what goes around comes around&amp;quot; category, the idea of &amp;quot;search neutrality&amp;quot; -- or the need for government intervention or regulation to ensure that search results from the likes of Google and other search engines aren&amp;#039;t discriminatory -- is starting to gain some traction. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:58:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79333 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Search Neutrality? How Google Became a &#039;Neutrality&#039; Target</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/4/30/search-neutrality-how-google-became-neutrality-target</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/search-neutrality-google-becomes-neutraliy.ars&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Search neutrality&amp;quot; now fills the FCC filings of companies like Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and AT&amp;amp;T, all of whom see no reason why their businesses should be picked out for regulatory scrutiny while Google goes about its business unmolested. So where did the idea of search neutrality come from, and what does it mean? 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/96">Ben Scott</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/issue/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/94">Free Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/215">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:37:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79265 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Search, but You May Not Find </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/75666</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/opinion/28raff.html?_r=2&amp;amp;emc=tnt&amp;amp;tntemail1=y&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Adam Raff&lt;br&gt;The FCC has proposed Net Neutrality rules, which would prohibit ISPs from discriminating against or charging premiums for certain services or applications on the Web. The commission is correct that ensuring equal access to the infrastructure of the Internet is vital, but it needs to look beyond Network Neutrality and include &amp;quot;search neutrality&amp;quot;

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/89">fcc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/215">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:17:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75666 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>After Net Neutrality, Will We Need &#039;Google Neutrality?&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74006</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/after-net-neutrality-will-we-need-google-neutrality.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=rss&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nate Anderson&lt;br&gt;A leading academic on network economics argues that Net Neutrality is a good thing -- but ISPs aren&amp;#039;t the only potential gatekeepers on the Internet. &amp;#039;Search Neutrality&amp;#039; might be needed next.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1301">ISPs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/215">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6500">search neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:50:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74006 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

