<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>gossip news</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6117</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Feeding the Outrage Machine</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/71611</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2009/08/feeding-outrage-machine&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Mother Jones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Kevin Drum&lt;br&gt;What happens when news organizations decide to quit covering the &amp;quot;boring&amp;quot; stuff and just follow the Politico model of &amp;quot;feeding the outrage machine&amp;quot; instead?  Is this really a world any of us want to live in?

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6117">gossip news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/530">junk news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/532">news coverage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6116">outrage machine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3305">Politico</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:56:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71611 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

