<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>search</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>ISPs Redirect Search Traffic on Yahoo, Bing, Raising Legal, Privacy Issues</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/8/8/isps-redirect-search-traffic-yahoo-bing-raising-legal-privacy-issues</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;amp;art_aid=155397&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Media Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Wendy Davis&lt;br&gt;More than 10 ISPs are redirecting search traffic on Yahoo and Bing, according to a new report. The report, which appeared in &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;New Scientist&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;, is based on research from the International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley and says the ISPs are sending users who search for brand names directly to the marketers&amp;#039; sites rather than displaying the search engines&amp;#039; results pages. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/83">Save The Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2694">DNS redirects</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/94">Free Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1301">ISPs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3559">online privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/paxfire">Paxfire</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/408">S. Derek Turner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/valueclick">ValueClick</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:08:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90766 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Social Media Reinvigorates the Market for Quality Journalism</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/4/15/why-social-media-reinvigorates-market-quality-journalism</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2011/04/12/social-journalism-quality/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Mashable&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Vadim Lavrusik&lt;br&gt;At the &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Washington Post&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; and other media organizations, referral traffic from social sites -- particularly Facebook and Twitter -- are outpacing the growth of referrals from search. This is largely because search links have largely been overtaken by paid links.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/campaign/save-news">Save the News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2983">social media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:12:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">88340 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Regulators Prepare to Dig into Google-ITA Deal</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/7/7/regulators-prepare-dig-google-ita-deal</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/06/regulators-prepare-to-dig-into-google-ita-deal/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Brad Stone&lt;br&gt;Last week, Google announced a deal to acquire ITA, a Boston-area  company that makes flight information software. The move will give Google a large foothold in the online travel search market, and control over a critical data source used by many of its competitors, including Kayak.com, Orbitz.com and Microsoft&amp;#039;s Bing. But first comes the regulatory review.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/67">Media Consolidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/616">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/ita">ITA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/category/free-tagging/online-travel-search">online travel search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:45:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81052 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google May Face Scrutiny as EU Regulator Examines Search-Engine Antitrust</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/7/7/google-may-face-scrutiny-eu-regulator-examines-search-engine-antitrust</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-07/google-search-engines-may-face-scrutiny-from-eu-regulator-almunia-says.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Stephanie Bodoni&lt;br&gt;Google, owner of the world&amp;#039;s most-used search engine, may face closer scrutiny as European Union regulators take a careful look at allegations of antitrust breaches in relation to Internet searches. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/616">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2325">European Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/224">international</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:15:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81044 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Belo, MediaNews May Block Google </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74839</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;amp;art_aid=117942&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Media Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Erik Sass&lt;br&gt;Two leading newspaper publishers -- A.H. Belo, the publisher of the &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Dallas Morning News&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;, and MediaNews Group, publisher of the &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Denver Post&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; -- are considering following Rupert Murdoch&amp;#039;s example by preventing Google News from indexing online content behind newly erected pay walls.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/3381">Belo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1483">blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2303">MediaNews Group</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5175">news aggregators</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:05:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74839 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Murdoch Can Afford to Leave Google for Bing</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74815</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=140695&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Advertising Age&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nat Ives&lt;br&gt;News Corp.&amp;#039;s talk about listing its sites exclusively on Microsoft&amp;#039;s Bing sounds unpromising in several ways. But all of Rupert Murdoch&amp;#039;s recent agitation and exploration are at least pushing one fact back to the fore: Web traffic only gets publishers so far in their quest for digital ad dollars. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6594">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6660">exclusive agreements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5175">news aggregators</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/491">News Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/487">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:42:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74815 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>News Corp. Weighs an Exclusive Alliance with Bing</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74791</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/technology/internet/24soft.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Tim Arango and Ashlee Vance&lt;br&gt;Microsoft has been in discussions with the News Corp. about a deal to pay to remove links to News Corp.&amp;#039;s news content from Google&amp;#039;s search engine and display them exclusively on Bing. If such an arrangement came to pass, it would be a watershed moment in the history of the Internet and set off a fierce debate over the future of content online.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6594">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6605">exclusive partnerships</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5175">news aggregators</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/487">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:58:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74791 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Murdoch, Microsoft, and Google</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74792</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/murdoch_microsoft_and_google.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Ryan Chittum&lt;br&gt;So Rupert Murdoch is trying to squeeze the search engines for some cash. This move seems more likely to be an incremental one for the news industry as far as revenue goes -- even if it backfires. The implications for the search industry longer term, however, could be more interesting. It&amp;#039;s hardly a silver bullet for the news.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6594">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6605">exclusive partnerships</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5175">news aggregators</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/491">News Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/487">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:58:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74792 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Murdoch Madness</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74789</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/11/23/murdoch-madness-2/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Buzz Machine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jeff Jarvis&lt;br&gt;Were Bing to pay News Corp. to drop Google, it would be a double-play in Google&amp;#039;s favor: Microsoft would lose money and gain little. And News Corp. would lose traffic.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/66">Future of the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6594">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6605">exclusive partnerships</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/5175">news aggregators</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/491">News Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/487">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:37:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74789 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Will Not Save the News Industry</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/node/74769</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abruptcorner.com/2009/11/microsoft-will-not-save-the-news-industry/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Abrupt Corner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The idea that a Web site has to pay to link to an item of news is completely against what the Internet is -- the free dissemination of information to all that seek it. If News Corp thinks Google is stealing the news, then they need to edit their robots.txt file to stop it. Otherwise stop whining and embrace what the Web stands for.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/6594">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/497">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/753">Internet Freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/681">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/491">News Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/2628">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:38:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stevie Converse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74769 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

