<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freepress.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>federal shield law</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Federal Shield Law Introduced in House Once More</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/9/20/federal-shield-law-introduced-house-once-more</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12156&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
In the latest step in a seven-year effort to pass a federal shield law, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) has re-introduced a bill that would provide protections for journalists in federal courts.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:30:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">91708 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York Times Reporter Subpoenad</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/5/25/new-york-times-reporter-subpoenad</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/2011/05/24/136620215/new-york-times-reporter-subpoenaed&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NPR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Carrie Johnson&lt;br&gt;The Justice Department has subpoenaed &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;New York Times&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; reporter Jim Risen to provide critical eyewitness testimony it says it can&amp;#039;t get any other way in the leak case involving former CIA operative Jeffrey Sterling. Risen says he&amp;#039;ll ask a judge to quash the subpoena, setting up a First Amendment fight and a game of chicken with high stakes.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/216">press freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:58:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89253 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Falling on Their Shield</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/3/4/falling-their-shield</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=5029&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;American Journalism Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jeffrey Benzing&lt;br&gt;After a disappointing defeat in the last Congress, proponents of a federal shield law for journalists aren&amp;#039;t expecting victory anytime soon. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:23:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87184 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Clear Danger to Free Speech</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2011/1/4/clear-danger-free-speech</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/opinion/04stone.html?ref=todayspaper&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Geoffrey R. Stone&lt;br&gt;If we grant the government too much power to punish those who disseminate information, then we risk too great a sacrifice of public deliberation; if we grant the government too little power to control confidentiality at the source, then we risk too great a sacrifice of secrecy. The answer is thus to reconcile the irreconcilable values of secrecy and accountability by guaranteeing both a strong authority of the government to prohibit leaks and an expansive right of others to disseminate information to the public. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4718">Wikileaks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:57:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85516 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unplug WikiLeaks? Enact a Federal Shield Law Instead</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/11/17/unplug-wikileaks-enact-federal-shield-law-instead</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-scheer/the-us-government-is-inte_b_784555.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Peter Scheer&lt;br&gt;The Obama administration has made no secret of its desire to unplug WikiLeaks, the whistleblower website infamous for data dumps of classified records. Of the few options available to the government, the best is one that probably hasn&amp;#039;t been considered in this context: Enacting a federal shield law. 

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:14:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">84450 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shield Law Showdown</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/10/29/shield-law-showdown</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4959&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;American Journalism Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
David Saleh Rauf&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#039;s do or die. That&amp;#039;s how media groups describe the state of the long-stalled legislation to create a federal shield law for journalists. The bill passed the House and has emerged from the Senate Judiciary Committee. But it is on the verge of suffering a familiar fate: Death in the Senate.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:00:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">84009 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s a Journalist? </title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/10/14/whats-journalist</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/journalism-shield-law-free-flow-of-information-act/Content?oid=2558859&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Chicago Reader&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Michael Miner&lt;br&gt;Among journalists, almost no one disputes the need for a federal shield law. Among politicians, the cause is not as noble. Journalists have been lobbying Congress for a shield law for six years, but Congress hasn&amp;#039;t passed one yet.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:22:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">83614 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mainstream Press Throws Wikileaks Under a Bus in Journalist Shield Debate</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/9/2/mainstream-press-throws-wikileaks-under-bus-journalist-shield-debate</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2010/09/01/mainstream-press-thr.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cory Doctrow&lt;br&gt;A new proposed federal journalist shield law is under debate in the U.S., which sounds like a great idea, except that the traditional press have agreed to amendments that would exempt Wikileaks from any protection for its confidential sources, on the grounds that Wikileaks isn&amp;#039;t journalism.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/4718">Wikileaks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:28:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82580 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shameful News Industry Willing to Sacrifice Wikileaks to Get Shield Law</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/8/31/shameful-news-industry-willing-sacrifice-wikileaks-get-shield-law</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/02573310781.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Techdirt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Mike Masnick&lt;br&gt;A few weeks ago, politicians who had been pushing for a much needed federal shield law for journalism, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), were taking the politically expedient route of adding a specific amendment designed to keep Wikileaks out of the bill&amp;#039;s protections. Apparently, a bunch of newspaper folks have apparently stepped forward to support this move.

</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:24:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82506 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Should Shield All Its Journalists</title>
 <link>http://www.freepress.net/news/2010/8/30/us-should-shield-all-its-journalists</link>
 <description>Full article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modbee.com/2010/08/27/1312764/us-should-shield-all-its-journalists.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Modesto Bee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The First Amendment doesn&amp;#039;t provide protection from prosecutors or judges -- who might threaten journalists with prosecution or incarceration -- when it comes to divulging sources or materials. A bill in Congress would create the same safeguards on a national level.


</description>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/1946">federal shield law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freepress.net/taxonomy/term/71">Quality Journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:22:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lindsy Embree</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82467 at http://www.freepress.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

