AT&T Applies the Brakes on the Mobile Economy
August 19, 2009
Posted by Timothy Karr
The telecom sector is too important to be allowed to hold back the U.S. economy, writes Andy Kessler in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal. But that's exactly what it's doing by overcharging for voice calls, eliminating network choice and stifling mobile phone innovation.
Kessler cites AT&T’s recent blocking of the Google Voice application (in apparent collusion with Apple) as evidence that the "135-year-old Alexander Graham Bell era" needs to come to an end:
"AT&T clings to the old business of charging for voice calls in minutes. It takes not much more than 10 kilobits per second of data to handle voice. In a world of megabit per-second connections, that's nothing--hence Google's proposal to offer voice calls for no cost and heap on features galore."
The market seems ripe for cost-cutting competitors. But the carriers have a plan: By owning the network and locking down all devices on it, they can block new technologies and stifle any innovation that they don’t control.
"It's inexcusable that new, feature-rich and productive applications like Google Voice are being held back, just to prop up AT&T," writes Kessler. "How many productive apps beyond Google Voice are waiting in the wings?"
The FCC's recent inquiry into AT&T's blocking is just the beginning. According to Kessler, we need to completely overhaul our telecom market to spark economic growth and open the airwaves to an explosion of game-changing innovations.
Kessler’s prescription follows many of the recommendations we have been making at Free Press:
1. End phone exclusivity. "Your broadband provider doesn't decide what kind of computer you can connect to at the end of your DSL or cable wire," Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) wrote for Free Press in June. Why should mobile carriers tie down devices? The bottom line is that exclusivity isn't a technology problem; it's an abuse of power problem. Get rid of that, and innovation will bloom.
2. Promote unlicensed access to the airwaves. Great advances in technology have created a need to modernize how we use spectrum. It’s time to shed closed networks that have placed the airwaves under lock and key in favor of open access for everyone.
3. End municipal exclusivity for cable companies. More mobile and fixed line Internet competition keeps prices down and networks more honest. Local monopolies allow few options for consumers who want to go elsewhere should their network provider, say, abuse Net Neutrality, the nondiscrimination principle that protects digital choice.
4. Speed up connections to homes and phones. Kessler says that data speeds should more than double every two years. Free Press has repeatedly called for a faster minimum requirement for all connections classified as "broadband" at the FCC. For too long, U.S. providers have gotten away with charging too much for connections that are a fraction of the speed available to users in Western Europe and parts of Asia.
President Obama and others have identified an open information economy as a main driver of America's economic recovery. We can't afford to let companies like AT&T apply the brakes.




Comments
A well written article
A well written article discussing the need to end phone exclusivity in the mobile markets. It is outrageous how much carriers overcharge for text messaging and phone calls. Also an issue worth noting and investigating is how much they charge for sending instant messages over mobile phones --- I checked for Verizon Wireless and they apparently say IMs are accounted for similarly to text messages but don't know exact rates if there are any for IMs.
Also that doesn't provide any info on IM charges for Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile service.
Carriers do tend to overcharge for data usage. Just this month I decided to try the VCast Music service, VCast Games and IM and for the first time ever since signing with Verizon am told I may incur overage fees for going over my minutes or data limits.
That was quick and it's not like I was using a whole lot of data. I only downloaded a few VCast games and some music. I only ever sent 3 IMs and then stopped sending them because the controls on my phone for IMing were not that good. When using VCast Music had signed up for $3.00 daily access plan. So I don't have to pay monthly subscription fees for VCast Music even when I don't use it. Only pay for usage of the service and downloading music.
The fact they charge $1.99 per track for music downloads to the phone but only 99 cents when downloading to a computer means they are overcharging for downloads directly to a phone on their network which is wrong. They should charge the same price no matter how a song is downloaded. In any case not wanting this to happen again have stopped accessing the VCast Music Store entirely on either the computer or the phone, have ceased sending IMs, and ceased downloading games to the phone. I will use whatever content I now have on the phone in future months but not have to pay more data fees for future downloads.
Meanwhile I will also continue to support the work of the Free My Phone Campaign and other campaigns of Free Press.Net
I have unlimited text so am not too worried about texting charges unless charged separately for IM -- only did 3 IMs total.
Does this really surprise
Does this really surprise you?
ATT got broken up once before over this kind of thing.
Bush et al let them merge back together and now it's back to "The network ain't done 'til nothing else runs"
Post new comment