ZDNet, March 4, 2004
By Declan McCullagh

Go Daddy is offering to pay part of ICANN's legal fees for defending a lawsuit from VeriSign.



Domain-name registrar Go Daddy for months has criticised VeriSign's currently suspended "Site Finder" service, which seized control of nonexistent .com and .net domains.



Now Go Daddy is putting its money where its mouth is. The company said on Tuesday that it will pay up to $100,000 (£54,104) of the legal bills that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) may run up through defending a lawsuit filed last week by VeriSign.



"Ideally, ICANN will submit its legal bills to us, and we'll pay them, up to $100,000," said Go Daddy president Bob Parsons. "I don't think the $100,000 will handle it. I'm pretty sure that we'll blow through the entire amount."



Last week, VeriSign sued ICANN in federal court in Los Angeles, alleging it was unlawfully blocked from adding new features to the .com and .net master database that it maintains under a contract with ICANN and the US government. Many of those proposed additions — such as Site Finder and a "Wait Listing Service" — have riled competitors Go Daddy and other domain name registrars, which have formed a coalition to fire back at VeriSign.



"They would like to be an unchecked monopoly," Parsons said. "We believe if they win at that, then everybody loses. Except, of course, VeriSign."



VeriSign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



The donation represents an ironic twist — and a kind of lesser-of-two-evils calculation by Go Daddy, which was one of the registrars that sued ICANN last year to block the Wait Listing Service. A federal judge dismissed the case in December.



While the donation represents a small fraction of ICANN's $6m budget for its 2003 fiscal year, it symbolises the frustration that many registrars seem to feel about VeriSign, a huge potential rival, and the unease about the changes the lawsuit could bring about.



A wildcard is the growing interest of the United Nations in regulating the Internet. Last week, its International Telecommunication Union (ITU) convened a workshop in Geneva where officials made what amounted to a pitch for the group to supplant ICANN.



One possibility is that the lawsuit, which accuses ICANN of antitrust violations, could destabilise the current Internet governance system to the point that the United Nations gets more closely involved. "If VeriSign gets what they want, ICANN becomes irrelevant and you don't have anyone watching the registry operator," said Christine Jones, general counsel for Go Daddy. "The more important player is the UN and the ITU, which is trying to gain control."



VeriSign, however, doesn't seem to want that outcome either. A memo from VeriSign vice president Rusty Lewis sent to employees last week said, "We believe a credible ICANN is the best thing for the Internet. We are in full support of a global framework for the coordination of the domain name system. This lawsuit is about getting clarity around ICANN."

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.