WFMU's Beware of the Blog, August 6, 2007

Like the backstabbing villain in a bad soap opera, sneaky SoundExchange has continued offering deceptive, unhelpful, so-called concessions to webcasters after new webcasting royalty rates went into effect on July 15. As a prime example, the latest "deal" offered to webcasters contains a wee little clause requiring DRM on all streams (since when did a technological mandate have anything to do with royalties?). Thankfully, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) is fed up with these dead-end negotiations, and is now focusing their substantial lobby power on passing the Internet Radio Equality Act. Some groups of indie musicians are opting out of the SoundExchange royalty scheme altogether, recognizing the value of the exposure they get on internet radio.

Meanwhile, Clear Channel and Last.fm have been requiring indie artists to waive their royalties as a condition for netplay. Artist advocacy groups FMC and A2IM were angered and eventually pressured Clear Channel to ditch their waiver. It's easy accuse Clear Channel of screwing indie artists (newsflash: they always have), but think about why these huge webcasters are now requiring waivers. It's the new webcasting rates, people! They are simply too high. I would be totally surprised if Clear Channel hasn't negotiated separate cut-rate webcasting agreements with the big 4 labels already.

Music Industry Gangsters Shake Down Broadcasters Next
Collecting ridiculous fees from webcasters isn't the record industry's only desperate solution to create "alternative streams of revenue" in these times of dwindling CD sales. The next victim in their royalty shakedown is broadcast radio. SoundExchange and the RIAA are both copping a new mantra, that airplay (or webplay) is not an effective promotional tool. Because nobody, and I mean nobody, ever ever purchases CDs, MP3s, or ringtones of songs they heard on the radio. Ever. As such, the RIAA claims (via a front called the Music First Coalition) that broadcasters should have to pay an additional performance royalty. The Music First Coalition believes so wholeheartedly that "corportate radio" is at fault for the decline in record sales that they went out of their way to fabricate a research study that claims so. Interestingly, this study has not motivated Music First Coalition members to discontinue servicing music to radio stations. This will likely turn into a battle of the lobbyists: RIAA vs. NAB. Unless, of course, someone bothers to brief our commander in chief. As an aside, foreign compadres of the RIAA have taken some cues from the good ol' US of A, and now Australian night clubs as well as Canadian dentists and hair salons are in danger of owing big, expensive royalties (thanks to Listener David for the links).

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.