Viacom vs. YouTube
Wall Street Journal, March 15, 2007
By Paul Kedrosky
One billion dollars. Viacom's claimed damages in its recently announced copyright infringement suit against Google sounds laughable, like something Dr. Evil might ask for in an Austin Powers movie. A billion is a Big and Scary Number. More important, is it the right Big and Scary Number, or is any such number even merited at all?
This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Comments
Viacom should get a grip
Viacom should get a grip most of their shows have gotten new viewers due to people seeing clips of them on youtube. A lot of people have gotten more viewers and even in real life, i saw some clips of a few broadway shows and from that i decided to go get some theatre tickets and check out the show with my girlfriend.
Post new comment