Change the Channels

Across the country, hundreds of TV stations are circumventing ownership rules at the expense of independent local journalism. Click below to find out if newsrooms are merging in your area — and learn what you can do about it.

 
  • Severe
  • More Severe
  • Most Severe
  • Featured

Show Recently AddedAll MarketsAll Owners

 
 

Covert Consolidation

When you turn on the nightly news, you expect to find competing viewpoints and different perspectives from one station to the next. But in communities across the country, stations that were once fierce competitors have cut staff and merged their newsrooms, in many cases airing the same content on multiple stations in the same market. You can try to change the channel, but all you'll see is the exact same newscast.

This kind of covert consolidation isn’t supposed to happen. But media companies have exploited loopholes in the Federal Communications Commission’s ownership rules. Many broadcasters claim that as long as a company’s name isn’t on a broadcast license, it can control everything from news programming to office operations without being considered an “owner.”But these deals, called “Shared Service Agreements,” look and act just like any other media merger.

Covert consolidation is at work in at least 83 of the nation’s 210 television markets. Free Press’ interactive map above documents the spread of covert consolidation across the country. Our Change the Channels campaign seeks to close the FCC’s loopholes and foster true competition in local media markets.

To take part in this campaign, you can join with others in your community to demand change at the local level. Help uncover these dirty deals; submit video and information to our national database; and take action to pressure local broadcasters. Together we’ll build a case against covert consolidation that the FCC won’t be able to ignore.

Resources

  • Joint Letter on FCC Media Ownership Rules

    December 14, 2012

    Members of the House Energy & Commerce Committee urged the Federal Communications Commission to steer clear of proposals that would allow for more media consolidation until the agency has studied the impact such rules would have on localism and diversity. The letter pointed out that the Internet is not a replacement for local news coverage and reminded the Commission it has a congressional mandate to protect and promote localism.

  • Change the Channels Toolkit

    June 14, 2012

    Download our activist toolkit for tips on how to Change the Channels in your community.

More »

Blog Posts

More »

Actions

  • No More Media for Murdoch

    Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski is trying to change the agency’s ownership rules to pave the way for Murdoch and other media barons to get exactly what they want.

  • Change the Channels!

    Broadcasters are airing cookie-cutter newscasts in at least 83 of the nation's 210 television markets. Tell the Federal Communications Commission to stop covert consolidation.

More »

Press Releases

  • Gannett Deal to Buy Belo Means Even More Consolidation for Local TV

    June 13, 2013
    WASHINGTON – On Thursday, Gannett announced a $1.5 billion purchase of TV station owner Belo. The deal would further consolidate the local TV market and make Gannett the nation’s fourth-largest owner of major network affiliates. The deal would put Gannett in control of both the daily newspaper and broadcast stations in Louisville, Ky., and Phoenix, Ariz., combinations that are currently prohibited under Federal Communications Commission rules.
  • Campaign Uncovers 22 New Covert Consolidation Deals

    July 29, 2011

    WASHINGTON -- SavetheNews.org has uncovered 22 more covert consolidation deals in its “Change the Channels” campaign. So far, more than 100 cases have been documented of local TV newsrooms combining operations to circumvent the Federal Communications Commission's media ownership limits at the expense of independent, local journalism.

  • Free Press Video on Covert Media Consolidation Restored to YouTube, Copyright Claim Dropped

    July 22, 2011

    WASHINGTON -- After Newport TV threatened legal action against an educational video created by Free Press that criticized the company for covertly consolidating its newsrooms, Newport has rescinded its YouTube take-down notice, and the video has been restored.

    Free Press Policy Counsel Corie Wright made the following statement:

More »

News from Around the Web

  • You Can Change the Channel, but Local News Is the Same

    New York Times
    May 28, 2012

    The stations in San Angelo, Texas, compete for viewers, but they cooperate in gathering the news — maintaining technically separate ownership, but sharing office space, news video and even the scripts written for their nightly news anchors. That is why viewers see the same segments on car accidents, the same interviews with local politicians, the same high school sports highlights. The same kind of sharing takes place in dozens of other cities. The changes have drawn the ire of critics, who charge that there are fewer and fewer journalists actually covering local news.

Learn More

  • Media Consolidation

    There are all sorts of benefits to a competitive media landscape. The more independent outlets a community has, the more different viewpoints will be presented on the air. But what happens when there’s no one left to compete?
  • Verizon/Cable Deal

    The Federal Communications Commission has voted to approve Verizon’s purchase of a valuable slice of the public airwaves in exchange for a partnership with a cartel of cable companies. While both the FCC and the Department of Justice placed conditions on the deal, this decision signals dark days ahead for consumers.

  • Rupert Murdoch Scandal

    There are many reasons the scandal engulfing Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. has riveted public attention around the world. It's a story that features all of the classic elements: crimes, betrayal, abuse of power and even a cover-up.

People + Policy

= Positive Change for the Public Good

people + policy = Positive Change for the Public Good